| Quantity: | Quality: |
| • cheapest option | • more expensive option |
| • many pages without proper testing | • many pages with proper testing |
| • containing html errors | • website without html errors |
| • no cross-browser testing | • cross-browser testing |
| • pure SEO - need to pay additional fees for high performances. | • including higher standard coding for SEO - paid once - no additional monthly fees. |
| Result: website without quality, overall cost much higher then suspected! | Result: highest standard of website, high quality performances, and overall cost much cheaper then suspected! |
| Think QUALITY - think Web Studio 'Marita' | |
Monday, 2 April 2012
Quantity versus Quality considering websites
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment